A disfuncionalidade do instituto da repercussão geral: limites e desafios para a aplicação da inteligência artificial no julgamento de processos

Abstract

The present work consists of an in-depth exposition on the trial of the General Repercussion before the Federal Supreme Court, which was introduced into the legal system by Constitutional Amendment No. 45/2004. In order to present the entire legal apparatus related to the mentioned institute, the role of the Extraordinary Appeal was emphasized, as well as the elements that constitute its relevance, denoting its characteristics, legal nature, appeal effects, especially its admissibility judgment, scoring the necessary requirements for the appeal to be heard. The Institute of General Repercussion is pointed out as an intrinsic assumption for the admissibility of the Extraordinary Appeal, using for this purpose a strong legislative apparatus, mainly in the New Code of Civil Procedure. In methodological terms, the research uses the hypothetical deductive method to understand the dysfunctionality of the general repercussion through data and statistics, as well as the possible solutions for such. The study focuses on the premise of dysfunctionality encompassed by the recognition of the General Repercussion, as well as its judgment by the Supreme Court, thus through statistics presented by the National Council of Justice, it was possible to expose the voluptuous numbers of cases to be analyzed and the temporal estimate for its resolutions. Finally, it analyzes the introduction of Artificial Intelligence in the courts, as well as the paths taken by scholars to achieve the accuracy achieved today, especially with the VICTOR project, headed by Minister Carmem Lucia in partnership with the University of Brasilia, which promises to improve the cases of trial of the General Repercussion by the Federal Supreme Court.