Análise comparativa entre softwares utilizados para cálculo estrutural

Abstract

The growing demand for efficiency, accuracy, and productivity in the civil construction sector has intensified the use of structural software in project development. In this context, it becomes essential to understand how different tools impact the structural and operational outcomes of a construction project. Thus, this study aims to conduct a comparative analysis between the structural design software Eberick and CYPECAD, both widely used for the design of reinforced concrete structures. The methodology involved modeling the same single-family residential building in both programs, using identical input parameters to ensure fairness in the results obtained. Aspects such as bending moments, reinforcement detailing, displacements, structural stability, material quantities, and user experience were analyzed. The results revealed significant differences in internal forces and consumption of steel and concrete, even with a standardized structural model. CYPECAD demonstrated greater analytical rigor and technical detailing but presented a less intuitive interface and increased complexity in data interpretation, which may hinder its use by less experienced professionals. Eberick, on the other hand, offered greater ease of use, a user-friendly interface, and well-organized results. These differences directly impact material quantities, and it was concluded that both software tools are technically feasible but have distinct approaches regarding usability and depth of analysis. Therefore, their selection should be based on the user's profile and the specific characteristics of the project.